Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1038

reference
953-tree-1
name
1038
tree-preservation-order

undefined

953-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.021423 50.876381)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.021394 50.876378,-1.021399 50.876388,-1.021414 50.876395,-1.021422 50.876396,-1.021439 50.876393,-1.021450 50.876384,-1.021451 50.876378,-1.021450 50.876373,-1.021446 50.876368,-1.021440 50.876364,-1.021432 50.876361,-1.021423 50.876360,-1.021406 50.876363,-1.021400 50.876367,-1.021396 50.876372,-1.021394 50.876378)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL